[Moo] FW: Proposed change to Corpora X.B.
cwymarc at comcast.net
cwymarc at comcast.net
Fri May 6 08:43:48 PDT 2005
Proposed changes to administrative sanctions officers may impose
-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: "Baron, Meg" <Meg.Baron at experian.com>
To: <announcements at sca.org>
Subject: [Announcements] Proposed change to Corpora X.B.
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 15:31:14 +0000
Unto the membership of the SCA, greetings:
At its March conference call, the Board of Directors enacted a number of
changes to the sections of the governing documents dealing with sanctions
against individuals. These changes had been put out to the membership for
comment, and a number of very thoughtful comments were sent in. The Board
wishes to thank all those who took the time to send us their input; several
of the suggestions that involved minor word changes for clarity were
incorporated into the final version.
However, a few changes that the Board thought were well worth considering
were deemed too substantive to enact without requesting comment on those
specific changes. One of those proposed changes appears below:
Corpora X.B, paragraph 1, currently reads as follows:
Officers may impose Administrative Sanction within their area of authority, for
just and stated cause, only in accordance with the rules defined in their
appropriate office handbook or specifically granted to their office in the
Governing Documents of the SCA. Administrative Sanctions might include, but are
not limited to, suspension or removal from office, revocation of authorization,
or the removal of a disruptive element from an event by the individual
responsible for the event as defined in the appropriate section of Corpora.
Officers below the Principality level may not impose Administrative Sanctions
lasting longer than a single event.
Proposed change (additions in ALL CAPS):
Officers may impose Administrative Sanction within their area of authority, for
just and stated cause, only in accordance with the rules defined in their
appropriate office handbook or specifically granted to their office in the
Governing Documents of the SCA. Administrative Sanctions might include, but are
not limited to, suspension or removal from office, revocation of authorization,
or the removal of a disruptive element from an event by the individual
responsible for the event as defined in the appropriate section of Corpora.
Officers below the Principality level may not impose Administrative Sanctions
lasting longer than a single event. OFFICERS AT THE KINGDOM OR PRINCIPALITY
LEVEL MAY NOT IMPOSE ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS LASTING LONGER THAN THE END OF
THEIR TERM OF OFFICE. OFFICERS AT ALL LEVELS MAY REQUEST THAT THEIR SUPERIOR
OFFICER IMPOSE SANCTIONS OF LONGER DURATION. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION IS TO BE
CONSTRUED AS INTERFERING WITH THE RIGHT OF OFFICERS AT ALL LEVELS TO APPOINT AND
REMOVE DEPUTY OFFICERS AS THEY SEE FIT.
Commentary on this proposed change to the Governing Documents is due by July 31,
2005.
Comments are strongly encouraged and can be sent to:
SCA Inc.
Box 360789
Milpitas, CA 95036
You may also email comments at sca.org or reply to this message.
This announcement is an official informational release by the Society for
Creative Anachronism , Inc. Permission is granted to reproduce this
announcement in its entirety in newsletters, websites and electronic mailing
lists.
_______________________________________________
Announcements mailing list
To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
http://www.sca.org/mailman/listinfo/announcements
To change the email address you receive these messages at, visit the URL
listed above, subscribe to with your new email address. Once this is
completed, return to the URL listed above and unsubscribe your old email
address.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.stierbach.org/pipermail/moo-stierbach.org/attachments/20050506/d0e24dc4/attachment-0003.htm>
More information about the Moo
mailing list