[Moo] Mythbusters and balistas.

[Marcolo DelMare]

I think it sounds like an awesome idea. I would point out that
"plausable" and "documentable" are very different things.

On 11/3/10, Jonathan Blaine <hourumiyamoto at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, thanks to the mythbusters, we can say that the Roman repeating balista
> is not only plausible, but we have somewhat of a schematic for it. This is
> good cause before I was told that many sca people don't believe it existed
> but we have some proof that it could of happened.. so... why don't we make
> one? We got schematic. At 8 arrows a minute that'd be devastating in pensic.
> What do you all say?
> On Nov 3, 2010 10:12 PM, "Shannon D. Combs-Bennett" <
> sdcbennett at alumni.indiana.edu> wrote:
>


-- 
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it has
to be us.
  - Jerry Garcia