[Moo] Moo Digest, Vol 115, Issue 10

[Jonathan Blaine]

Why was it taken off the baronial website to begin with if we had
information on it?
On Jul 8, 2013 8:09 AM, "Amie Sparrow" <troenwolf at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Miriel,
>
> As someone who used to do a fair number of baronial scrolls early in my
> SCA participation, I think your project would be very useful. I applaud you
> for taking it on. There's no reason we can't have our own litte book.
>
> It was a lot easier to get to Baronial scroll information when it was on
> the Stierbach website. Now you have to dig for it on the Atlantia site. If
> someone is a newbie, it would be discouraging.
>
> I will check my old scroll information to see if I have alternate wording
> for Baronial scrolls.
>
> Amie Sparrow
>
>  ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:52:26 -0400
> From: miriel.denedham at gmail.com
> To: moo at lists.stierbach.org
> Subject: Re: [Moo] Moo Digest, Vol 115, Issue 10
>
> The reasons this project seemed like a good idea when I proposed it:
>
> 1. The award badge images only seem to be available through a scribal
> version of word of mouth and even the blazonings are buried in the O and A.
>
> 2. I have exactly one award text verbage for each award, most of which
> have notations indicating they were approved by Mika and Ursula.  These
> used to be available on Enequy's website that held the Baronial OP.
>
> 3. I'm hosting a scriptorium that wants to help with court dockets, scroll
> backlogs, and several other projects, but the bulk of the participants are
> just starting out or for some other reason are uncomfortable with entirely
> improvising award text, much less doing that for every single scroll.
>
> One easy-to-acquire document, containing all that information and tailored
> specifically to our barony, in a familiar format and in a central
> location seemed like an ideal solution.  I saw a need, so I tried to fill
> it.  I apologize that my desire to help has apparently caused some offense
> or confusion.  I would still like to see the project through, even if it
> will never be well received by the barony at large.
>
> Miriel de Nedham
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Suzanne Olson <lady_esperanza at cox.net>wrote:
>
> I like that there is not set text so that awards can be more personalize,
> less cookie cutter. That way everyone's scrolls can be tailored to them.
>
> Like you said previously, variety keeps court more interesting.
>
> Baroness Esperanza
>
> On Jul 7, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Suzanne Olson <lady_esperanza at cox.net> wrote:
>
> > It was my understanding that there was not set award text for an of the
> Stierbach awards. I like it this way.
> >
> > I guess scribes could use the canned text like kingdom level scrolls but
> I would prefer that they don't have to. Just like with Kingdom level
> awards, the canned texted doesn't have to be used.
> >
> > Baroness Esperanza
> >
> > On Jul 7, 2013, at 11:01 PM, Jeanne Zabel <jzabel at va.metrocast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Miriel and I have copies of the baronial award
> >> texts.  But there is only one set of wording for each award.
> >>
> >> The kingdom handbook has several text variations as well as the
> graphics for each award.
> >>
> >> Miriel would like to create a similar handbook for Stierbach scribes to
> use for baronial awards and is looking for input to create a variety of
> texts for each award.
> >>
> >> Having variety keeps court more interesting since the herald would not
> be reading the same wording over and over.
> >>
> >> In service,
> >> Christina de Nedham
> >>
> >> On 7/7/2013 5:36 PM, moo-request at lists.stierbach.org wrote:
> >>> Send Moo mailing list submissions to
> >>>   moo at lists.stierbach.org
> >>>
> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>>   http://lists.stierbach.org/listinfo.cgi/moo-stierbach.org
> >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>>   moo-request at lists.stierbach.org
> >>>
> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>>   moo-owner at lists.stierbach.org
> >>>
> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >>> than "Re: Contents of Moo digest..."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Today's Topics:
> >>>
> >>>   1. ISO Stierbach award text (Miriel de Nedham)
> >>>   2. Re: ISO Stierbach award text (Jonathan Blaine)
> >>>   3. Re: ISO Stierbach award text (Brian Bertrand)
> >>>   4. Re: ISO Stierbach award text (Made For Willow)
> >>>   5. Re: ISO Stierbach award text (Sunniva Kyrre)
> > _______________________________________________
> > Moo mailing list
> > Moo at lists.stierbach.org
> > http://lists.stierbach.org/listinfo.cgi/moo-stierbach.org
> _______________________________________________
> Moo mailing list
> Moo at lists.stierbach.org
> http://lists.stierbach.org/listinfo.cgi/moo-stierbach.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Moo mailing list
> Moo at lists.stierbach.org
> http://lists.stierbach.org/listinfo.cgi/moo-stierbach.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moo mailing list
> Moo at lists.stierbach.org
> http://lists.stierbach.org/listinfo.cgi/moo-stierbach.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.stierbach.org/pipermail/moo-stierbach.org/attachments/20130708/2c6ee9de/attachment-0003.htm>